1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRIAN WHITAKER, Case No. 21-cv-08772-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 9 v. COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION 10 CANCHA LLC, OVER UNRUH ACT CLAIM 11 Defendant. a 12

13 This case was filed on November 11, 2021, against defendant Cancha LLC. Dkt. No. 1.

v 14 || Defendant failed to respond to the complaint, and Whitaker moved for entry of default on May 5, © 15 2022. Dkt. No. 16. The Clerk entered default on June 15, 2022. Dkt. No. 17. Whitaker has not yet 16 || moved for default judgment. € = 17 The Court sua sponte takes judicial notice of the fact that Johnson is a high-frequency

Zz 18 plaintiff. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by 5 p.m. on October 17, 2022, 19 why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Johnson’s state- 20 law Unruh Act claim for the reasons stated in Vo v. Choi, No. 20-55737, slip op. at 11-16 (9th 21 Cir. Sept. 21, 2022) (affirming district court’s declination of supplemental jurisdiction over 22 || Unruh Act claim after entry of default but prior to default judgment); see also Arroyo v. Rosas, 23

(9th Cir. 2021). 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: October 11, 2022 Site WU tee 26 □□ > SUSAN ILLSTON 7 United States District Judge 28