United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2022

Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided November 8, 2022
Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK, Case No. 20-cv-08094-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 Vv. REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF AN AMENDED JUDGMENT 10 MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., [Re: ECF 68, 71] 11 Defendant.

13 Judgment was entered for Defendant on November 10, 2021. See ECF 33. On October v 14 12, 2022, Defendant filed a Proposed Amended Judgment that incorporates a post-judgment award || of attorneys’ fees and costs. See ECF 68. The Court directed Defendant to file additional briefing Q 16 || addressing the Court’s authority to enter an amended judgment, and directed Plaintiff to file any = 17 || opposition within fourteen days after Defendant filed its brief. See ECF 70.

2 18 Defendant filed its brief on October 21, 2022, citing cases in which courts have issued || amended judgments to incorporate post-judgment awards of attorneys’ fees. See ECF 71. The || Court is satisfied that it has authority to enter the requested amended judgment. See Baskin- 21 Robbins Franchising LLC v. Chun, No. 5:18-CV-05476-BLF, 2019 WL 5268883, at *4 (N.D. Cal. || Oct. 17, 2019). Plaintiff has not filed opposition and his deadline to do so expired on November || 4, 2022.

24 Defendant’s request for entry of an amended judgment is GRANTED. The amended || judgment will be entered immediately after this order is filed.

27 Dated: November 8, 2022 ey) BETH LABSON FREEMAN 28 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.