Ottolini v. City of Rohnert Park
Ottolini v. City of Rohnert Park
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ERIC OTTOLINI, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02851-EMC
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 v.
10 CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, et al., 11 Defendants.
12 13 14 Parties were given due notice of case management conference held on November 8, 2022. 15 Plaintiff failed to appear despite attempts by opposing counsel to contact him. Nor did Plaintiff 16 participate in the drafting of the joint case management conference statement as he is required to 17 do. The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to Show Cause as to why the case should not be dismissed 18 for failure to prosecute. Am. Unites for Kids v. Rousseau,
985 F.3d 1075, 1088(9th Cir. 2021); 19 Bal v. Kaplan Inc., No. C-01-0570 VRW,
2001 WL 969053, at *1–2 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2001). 20 Plaintiff shall respond by November 22, 2022. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: November 9, 2022 25 26 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN 27 United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown