1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ZACHARY THAYER, Case No. 21-cv-03937-TLT 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR 9 Vv. FAILURETO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 NAPA COUNTY, et al., ll Defendants.

5 13 On October 17, 2022, the Court entered an Order dismissing plaintiff's first amended S 14 || complaint with leave to amend. ECF No. 14. Plaintiff's amended complaint was due by 3 15 November 17, 2022. Id. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Thus, the Order a 16 of dismissal stands, and the case is dismissed. See Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier,

, 989

= 17 || (9th Cir. 1999) (affirming dismissal of action following plaintiff's failure to amend complaint after 18 || receiving leave to do so, where the interest in expeditious resolution of litigation, the court’s 19 || management of its docket, and avoiding prejudice to defendants favored dismissal). 20 The Clerk of the Court shall close the file and not accept any further filings in this docket 21 || number. This Order terminates the case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: November 28, 2022 24

TRINA MPSON 26 United States District Judge 27 28