McCarthy v. Amazon.com, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

McCarthy v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NICOLAS MCCARTRY, et al., Case No. 3:22-cv-05718-JD 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE ECF REQUEST 9 v. 10 AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., ll Defendants. 12

Paul Fullwood represents that he is the president of defendant Loudwolf, Inc., and requests S 14 || permission for electronic case filing (ECF). Dkt. No. 12. The request is denied. 3 15 Fullwood is not a defendant and not an attorney. He cannot represent Loudwolf in this a 16 || litigation. “It has been the law for the better part of two centuries . . . that a corporation may 3 17 || appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel.” Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, Unit 18 IT Men’s Advisory Council,

506 U.S. 194, 200-01

(1993). This rule is codified in our Civil Local 19 || Rules at Rule 3-9(b). The rule states that “[a] corporation, unincorporated association, partnership 29 || or other such entity may appear only through a member of the bar of this Court.” Civil L. R. 3- 21 || 9b). 2 Consequently, Mr. Fullwood cannot appear for Loudwolf, Inc., a California corporation, 23 || and ECE access is not warranted. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: December 7, 2022 26 JAMEYPONATO 27 UnitedA tates District Judge 28

Reference

Status
Unknown