Caradine v. Faulder
Caradine v. Faulder
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LEARTIS K.M. CARADINE, Case No. 22-cv-02085-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v. 10 KEITH FAULDER, et al., ll Defendants. 12 On August 26, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's civil rights complaint for failure to 13 || present a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted 28 days to file an amended complaint. 14 || He has failed to do so. This case is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX 3 15 Technologies v. Miller,
104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed 16 with leave to amend and Plaintiff does not amend, further district court determination is = 17 || necessary). 18 The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: December 21, 2022 21 lua Sol JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY 23 United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown