Navarrette v. Department of Homeland Security
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TOMMY NAVARRETTE, Case No.: 22cv6-LL-RBM Inmate No. BMP-960, ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. [ECF No. 2] AND (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 15 PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO SECURITY; JANE DOE 1 AND 2; U.S. PREPAY FILING FEES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; METROPOLITAN CORRECTION CENTER SAN DIEGO, 18 Defendants.
21 Plaintiff Tommy Navarrette, currently housed at the Santa Rita Jail located in Dublin, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 23 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.)
26 I. Motion to Proceed IFP 27 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, a prisoner granted leave to proceed IFP remains obligated to pay the entire fee in “increments” or “installments,” Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 83–84 (2016); Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), and regardless of whether his action is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002).
9 Section 1915(a)(2) requires prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP to submit a “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution having custody of the prisoner then collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month’s income, in any month in which his account exceeds $10, and forwards those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2); Bruce, 577 U.S. at 84‒85.
21 While Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed IFP, he has not attached a certified copy of his Inmate Statement Report for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $52. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2020). The additional $52 administrative fee does ||clearly requires that prisoners “seeking to bring a civil action . . . without prepayment of ||fees .... shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional || equivalent) .... for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 4 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis added). Without these certified trust account statements, ||the Court is unable to assess the appropriate amount of the initial filing fee which may be || statutorily required to initiate the prosecution of this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
7 II. Conclusion and Order 8 For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that: 9 (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED, and the action is || DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $402 civil filing fee required by 11 U.S.C. 8§ 1914(a); 12 (2) Plaintiff is GRANTED forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order in 13 which to re-open his case by either: (a) prepaying the entire $402 civil filing and 14 administrative fee in one lump-sum; or (b) filing a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP, which ||includes a prison certificate, signed by a trust accounting official attesting as to his || trust account balances and deposits and/or a certified copy of his Inmate Statement ||Report for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 || U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b); and 19 (3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a Court- approved || form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis” for his || use and convenience.
22 IT IS SO ORDERED.
23 ||Dated: January 25, 2022 NO 24 nF 25 Honorable Linda Lopez United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.