United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2022

Dawes v. The People of the State of California

Dawes v. The People of the State of California
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided February 3, 2022
Dawes v. The People of the State of California

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM DAWES, Case No. 19-cv-2122-MMA (WVG) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF 13 vs. PROCEEDINGS THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF [Doc. No. 58] CALIFORNIA, et al.

Defendants.

18 Plaintiff William Dawes, a California inmate proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Bravo, Gene, Ugalde, Ausbury, Silva, Shellano, Ayala, Solis, and Zuniga. See Doc. No. 13. The parties previously moved to stay these proceedings for a period of four months pending the outcome of related criminal proceedings in state court. See Doc. No. 44; see also S.D. Sup. Ct. No. SCS287189. The Court granted the motion and extended the stay through February 18, 2022. See Doc. Nos. 46, 50.

25 Defendants have filed a Status Report advising the Court that a further stay is warranted due to developments in Plaintiff’s pending criminal proceedings, including issues regarding Plaintiff’s competency, a further stay is warranted. See Doc. No. 58.

28 Upon due consideration of the supporting declaration of defense counsel and the relevant || factors set forth in Keating v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 45 F.3d 322, 324—25 (9th Cir. || 1995), the Court finds that a further stay of this action is appropriate. Neither Plaintiff, || Defendant, nor any interested third parties will suffer prejudice because of an extension ||of the stay of proceedings in this Court. As the Court previously noted, proceedings related to Plaintiff's criminal charges may impact certain claims and issues in this action.

6 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS this action stayed through August 18, 2022.

7 || The Court further ORDERS Defendants to submit a status report no later than five (5) court days prior to the expiration of the stay advising the Court regarding the related || criminal proceedings and indicating whether circumstances warrant a further stay of these 10 proceedings. After consideration of the report, the Court will decide whether to lift the || stay.

12 IT IS SO ORDERED.

13 Dated: February 3, 2022 14 [dhs Vu - /huphler 15 HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO 16 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.