Randall Firestone v. Residential Properties Resources Fund II, LLC
Randall Firestone v. Residential Properties Resources Fund II, LLC
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:23-cv-00292-RGK-E Document 20 Filed 01/18/23 Page1of1 Page ID #:1892
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case □□□ 2:23-cv-00292-RGK-E Date January 18, 2023 Title Firestone et al v. Residential Properties Resources Fund II, LLC et al JS6
Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Joseph Remigio Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Dismissal
Having reviewed the complaint filed in this action, the Court DISMISSES the case for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiffs allege diversity jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1332, which gives district courts original jurisdiction over any civil action in which the parties are citizens of different states, and the action involves an amount in controversy that exceeds $75,000. Plaintiffs also allege that they are “members and investors” of the two limited liability companies (“LLCs”) that are named as defendants. An LLC “4s a citizen of every state of which its owners/members are citizens.” Johnson v. Columbia Props. Anchorage, LP,
437 F.3d 894, 899(9th Cir. 2006). Plaintiffs and Defendants are therefore citizens of the same states. As such, there is no complete diversity, so the Court lacks jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1332.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JRE/k
CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1
Reference
- Status
- Unknown