Case 2:22-cv-07214-SPG-MAR Document 11 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:39

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-07214-SPG(MARx) Date January 19, 2023

Title Yanyan Yu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before February 2, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendant(s):

Alejandro Mayorkas; Ur Mendoza Jaddou; and Rosemary Langley Melville

did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by

Page 1 of 2 Case 2:22-cv-07214-SPG-MAR Document 11 Filed 01/19/23 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:40

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-07214-SPG(MARx) Date January 19, 2023

Title Yanyan Yu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al

seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

:

Initials of Preparer pg

Page 2 of 2