United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2023

GS Holistic, LLC v. Quality Experience

GS Holistic, LLC v. Quality Experience
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided January 25, 2023
GS Holistic, LLC v. Quality Experience

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-07201-SPG-PVC Document 14 Filed 01/25/23 Pagelofi1 Page ID #:59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Case No. CV 22-07201-SPG(PVCx) Date January 25, 2023 Title GS Holistic, LLC v. Quality Experience et al Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceeding: CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before February 8, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendant(s) Abdelmalak Khalil, and Quality Experience did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT ISSO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer pg Page 1 of 1

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.