PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. Zoetop Business Co. Limited
PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. Zoetop Business Co. Limited
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:21-cv-02424-SPG-E Document 37 Filed 02/22/23 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:314
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 21-02424-SPG(Ex) Date February 22, 2023
Title PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. Zoetop Business Co. Limited et al
Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present Not Present
Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).
The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before March 8, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
Defendant Shein Distribution Corporation did not answer the second amended complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer pg
Page 1 of 1
Reference
- Status
- Unknown