Crystal Ketchup v. Fifth Third Bank
Crystal Ketchup v. Fifth Third Bank
Trial Court Opinion
Case 5:22-cv-01334-JGB-SHK Document 22 Filed 03/24/23 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:86 JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Case No. EDCV 22-1334 JGB (SHKx) Date March 24, 2023 Title Crystal Ketchup v. Fifth Third Bank
Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MAYNOR GALVEZ Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: Order DISMISSING Plaintiff’s Complaint for Failure to Prosecute (IN CHAMBERS) On June 29, 2022, pro se Plaintiff Crystal Ketchup (“Plaintiff”) filed her complaint in San Bernardino County Superior Court. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1-1.) On July 29, 2022, Defendant Fifth Third Bank, National Association (“Defendant”) removed the case. (“Notice of Removal,” Dkt. No. 1.) On September 12, 2022, on the basis that the Complaint failed to state a cognizable claim and that Plaintiff did not file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“MTD,” Dkt. No. 7), the Court granted Defendant’s MTD with leave to amend. (“MTD Order,” Dkt. No. 18.) In its MTD Order, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint no later than September 26, 2022, and warned Plaintiff that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the action. (Id. at 2.) As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint and has failed to prosecute her case. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) grants the Court authority to sua sponte dismiss actions for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(b); Wolff v. California,
318 F.R.D. 627, 630(C.D. Cal. 2016). Plaintiffs must prosecute their cases with “reasonable diligence” to avoid dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b). Anderson v. Air W., Inc.,
542 F.2d 522, 524(9th Cir. 1976). Plaintiff has failed to adhere to the Court’s order to file an amended complaint for approximately six months. The Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case with reasonable diligence and that dismissal is therefore appropriate. Page 1 of 2 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk mg Case 5:22-cv-01334-JGB-SHK Document 22 Filed 03/24/23 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:87
Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s action for failure to prosecute and DIRECTS the Clerk to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Page 2 of 2 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk mg
Reference
- Status
- Unknown