United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2023

John Ho v. Brite Spot, LLC

John Ho v. Brite Spot, LLC
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided June 23, 2023
John Ho v. Brite Spot, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-01328-SPG(MRWx) Date June 23, 2023 Title John Ho v. Brite Spot, LLC et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before July 7, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default as to Defendant(s) Brite Spot, LLC and BSLB, LLC, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff(s) have not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

: Initials of Preparer pg

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.