Cynthia Lopez-Murray v. United Parcel Service Inc.
Cynthia Lopez-Murray v. United Parcel Service Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CYNTHIA LOPEZ-MURRAY, ) Case No. CV 22-1567 FMO (JEMx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. et al, ) ) 14 Defendant. ) ) 15 ) 16 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 73, 17 Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed 18 without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than August 19 14, 2023, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction 20 over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or 21 seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed 22 as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 23 Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626, 629-30,
82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388(1962). 24 Dated this 29th day of June, 2023. 25 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 26 United States District Judge 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown