CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-07265-SPG-SK Date July 7, 2023

Title Capital Providers of Cambridge Sarnano, LLC et al v-Kevin Robl et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause by no later than July 19, 2023, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Plaintiffs allege this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to

and 1367 based on claims asserted under federal law. (ECF No. 1 ¶ 17). However, it appears that the only claim asserted under a federal statute is Plaintiffs’ tenth claim for relief. Plaintiffs’ tenth claim is brought under

and 3301. Neither statute provides a private right of action. See, e.g., Tasaka v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 17-CV-07235 (LDH)(ST),

, at *6 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022). Accordingly, they cannot serve as the basis for federal question jurisdiction. See Reynolds v. Wilkerson, No. 13-CV-04855- LHK,

, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

:

Initials of Preparer pg