_____________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 8:23-cv-01015-FWS-JDE Date: July 26, 2023 Title: Daniel L. Maher et al. v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. et al.

Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Melissa H. Kunig N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

This action was removed to this court on June 9, 2023. (Dkt. 1.) Jurisdiction is alleged on the basis of diversity jurisdiction pursuant to

. However, it appears the court may lack subject matter jurisdiction because the Complaint may not adequately allege the citizenship of all artificial entities. (See Dkt. 1.)

Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity between the parties and that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See Strawbridge v. Curtiss,

(1806);

(a). In the case of a partnership, limited liability company, or other unincorporated association, the court must consider the citizenship of each of the partners, including limited partners, or members. The citizenship of each of the entity’s partners or members must therefore be alleged. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs.,

(1990); Johnson v. Columbia Props. Anchorage, LP,

(9th Cir. 2006). Where a party is joined as a corporation, the complaint must allege both its respective state(s) of incorporation and principal place of business.

(c); Harris v. Rand,

(9th Cir. 2012).

Here, the Notice of Removal alleges Defendant Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. _____________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 8:23-cv-01015-FWS-JDE Date: July 26, 2023 Title: Daniel L. Maher et al. v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. et al. (Dkt. 1 ¶ 10.) The citizenships of its members, however, are not alleged. Accordingly, it appears complete diversity of the parties is inadequately alleged. See Johnson,

.

Accordingly, the court ORDERS Defendants to show cause in writing no later than August 8, 2023, why this action should not be remanded to California Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond by the above date will result in the Court remanding this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (“If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.”); see also Gaus v. Miles, Inc.,

(9th Cir. 1992) (federal courts “strictly construe the removal statute against removal jurisdiction”).