Deniz Felix-Lin v. Walmart, Inc.
Deniz Felix-Lin v. Walmart, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DENIZ FELIX-LIN, ) Case No. CV 22-4354 FMO (MARx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 WALMART, INC., et al. ) ) 14 Defendants. ) ) 15 ) 16 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 23, 17 Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Dates), IT IS ORDERED that the above- 18 captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good 19 cause shown by no later than 45 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. 20 The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this 21 action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set 22 forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. 23 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626, 629-30,
82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 24 (1962). 25 Dated this 27th day of July, 2023. 26 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 27 United States District Judge 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown