Peninsula Ventures I LLC v. Nano Vision PTE LTD

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Peninsula Ventures I LLC v. Nano Vision PTE LTD

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PENINSULA VENTURES I LLC, ) Case No. CV 22-3247 FMO (JEMx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 NANO VISION PTE LTD., et al., ) ) 14 Defendant. ) ) 15 ) 16 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 52, 17 Joint Report), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs 18 and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than 30 days, to re-open 19 the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and 20 this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of 21 time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the 22 parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash 23 R.R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626, 629-30

,

82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388

(1962). 24 Dated this 31st day of July, 2023. 25 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 26 United States District Judge 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown