Dennis Cooper v. Hesperia 2011, LLC

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Dennis Cooper v. Hesperia 2011, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 23-413 JGB (KKx) Date August 1, 2023 Title Dennis Cooper v. Hesperia 2011, LLC et al.

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MAYNOR GALVEZ Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause (IN CHAMBERS) Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met.

Additionally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure grants the Court authority to sua sponte dismiss actions for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Wolff v. California,

318 F.R.D. 627, 630

(C.D. Cal. 2016). A plaintiff must prosecute her case with “reasonable diligence” to avoid dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b). Anderson v. Air W., Inc.,

542 F.2d 522, 524

(9th Cir. 1976). Here, it appears that Plaintiff may have failed to prosecute this case with reasonable diligence because the case has been largely dormant for three months.

Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before August 10, 2023 why this action should not be dismissed as to the applicable defendant(s) for failure to effectuate service and lack of prosecution. The Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument and the Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by Plaintiff is due. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this OSC may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Reference

Status
Unknown