Gideon Siebert v. N.E.R.D. Power CA, LLC
Gideon Siebert v. N.E.R.D. Power CA, LLC
Trial Court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:23-cv-06305-JLS-RAO Date: August 10, 2023 Title: Gideon Siebert v. N.E.R.D. Power CA, LLC et al Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Gabby Garcia N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
Not Present Not Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
Defendant removed this action on August 2, 2023, invoking the Court’s diversity jurisdiction under
18 U.S.C. § 1332. (See Notice of Removal (“NOR”), Doc 1.) “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
511 U.S. 375, 377(1994). As the party invoking federal jurisdiction, Defendant has the burden of establishing that this case lies within the Court’s limited jurisdiction. See
id.A federal court has diversity jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1332if the parties to the action are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). In determining the citizenship of a limited liability company, “an LLC is a citizen of every state of which its owners/members are citizens.” Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP,
437 F.3d 894, 899(9th Cir. 2006). Here, Defendant, an LLC, improperly cites to the test for the citizenship of a corporation, rather than that of an LLC, in arguing that it is a citizen of New Mexico and Arizona for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. (NOR ¶ 14.) While Defendant does allege that its “sole Managing Member, Babe Kilgore” is “based out of its Gilbert, Arizona office,” it has not alleged Kilgore’s citizenship. (Id.) Defendant’s assertion of citizenship is therefore insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing (no longer than five pages), within seven days of the date of this Order, why the Court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to timely respond will result in the immediate dismissal of the case. ______________________________________________________________________________ CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:23-cv-06305-JLS-RAO Date: August 10, 2023 Title: Gideon Siebert v. N.E.R.D. Power CA, LLC et al
Initials of Preparer: gga
______________________________________________________________________________
Reference
- Status
- Unknown