James Diep v. Warden
James Diep v. Warden
Trial Court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. SA CV 23-355 ODW (MRW) Date August 10, 2023 Title Diep v. Warden
Present: Hon. Michael R. Wilner, U.S. Magistrate Judge James Muñoz n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys for Petitioner: Attorneys for Respondent: n/a n/a Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL
1. In June 2023, the Attorney General moved to dismiss this habeas action on procedural grounds. (Docket # 13.) The Court issued an order requiring Petitioner to respond to the motion by July 21, 2023. (Docket # 15.) To date, Petitioner has not filed any response to the motion or the Court’s order. 2. Petitioner is ordered to show cause why the motion should not be granted for the grounds stated by the Attorney General and for Petitioner’s failure to oppose the motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-12. Petitioner’s response to the OSC and his substantive response to the motion are due by or before August 31, 2023. Petitioner is advised that the failure to respond to this order will lead the Court to conclude that the motion is unopposed under Local Rule 7-12, and the action will be dismissed on that basis and under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 for failure to prosecute the action. Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. Lichtenegger,
913 F.3d 884(9th Cir. 2019).
Reference
- Status
- Unknown