United States v. XCast Labs, Inc.

United States District Court for the Central District of California

United States v. XCast Labs, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case № 2:23-cv-03646-ODW (JCx) 11

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING 13 DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED v. MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY 14 OF DEFAULT [16] 15 XCAST LABS, INC.,

16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On August 3, 2023, Defendant XCast Labs, Inc. moved to set aside entry of 20 default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c). (Mot. Set Aside Entry 21 Default (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 16.) On August 11, 2023, Plaintiff United 22 States filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to the Motion. (Notice, ECF No. 18.) 23 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the 24 Court deems the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ.

25 P. 78

(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. The United States does not oppose XCast’s Motion, 26 and the Court finds that XCast has shown good cause to set aside the entry of default 27 pursuant to Rule 55(c). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS XCast’s unopposed Motion 28 to Set Aside Entry of Default. (ECF No. 16.) 1 The Court ORDERS XCast to file an answer or a motion pursuant to Rule 12 2 || of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by August 21, 2023. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 August 14, 2023 ss 7 Géed 9 OTIS D. WRIGHT, I 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown