United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2023

FUSA Franchisor SPV LLC v. SBG, Inc.

FUSA Franchisor SPV LLC v. SBG, Inc.
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided October 3, 2023
FUSA Franchisor SPV LLC v. SBG, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No.: CV 23-02673-AB (Ex) Date: October 3, 2023 Title: FUSA Franchisor SPV LLC v. SBG, Inc. et al Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before October 17, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. ) Defendant(s) did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk CB

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.