Viral DRM, LLC v. Paul Duane Beauregard

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Viral DRM, LLC v. Paul Duane Beauregard

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-06398-SPG(AJRx) Date November 27, 2023

Title Viral DRM, LLC v. Paul Duane Beauregard

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before December 13, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff’s response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default as to Defendant Paul Duane Beauregard, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff has not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

:

Initials of Preparer pg

Reference

Status
Unknown