Baddieville Inc. v. Leur Baddieville Inc.
Baddieville Inc. v. Leur Baddieville Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 JS-6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BADDIEVILLE INC., ) Case No. CV 23-00070 FMO (Ex) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 14 LEUR BADDIEVILLE INC., et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 36, 18 Minutes of Settlement Conference), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby 19 dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later 20 than 30 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full 21 jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to 22 re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall 23 be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. 24 Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626, 629-30,
82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388(1962). 25 Dated this 30th day of November, 2023. 26 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 27 United States District Judge 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown