United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2023

(SS) Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided February 15, 2023
(SS) Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE, WSBA No. 32245 Associate General Counsel Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 Social Security Administration MARCELO ILLARMO (MABN 670079) Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 7 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21235 8 Telephone: (510) 970-4822 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CAROLINE LEE, ) Case No. 2:20-cv-00662-JDP ) Plaintiff ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 14 ) ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S v. ) FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO 15 ) JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) 17 ) Defendant ) 18 ) ____________________________________) 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of six thousand six hundred sixteen dollars and twenty-five cents ($6,616.25) and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). Accordingly, should this Court award fees and expenses under EAJA pursuant to this stipulation, Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees (ECF 29) would be moot.

27 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of any assignment of EAJA fees by Plaintiff to his counsel Jesse Kaplan (Counsel). Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel pursuant to an assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Counsel.

8 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel, including his firm, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA .

16 Respectfully submitted, Dated: February 13, 2023 By: /s/ Jesse Kaplan* 19 JESSE KAPLAN *By email authorization on 2/9/23 20 Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: February 13, 2023 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney By: /s/ Marcelo Illarmo 24 MARCELO ILLARMO Special Assistant United States Attorney

Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Ac Fees, Costs, and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $6,616.25 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. Furthermore, Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (ECF 29) is denied ° as moot.

7 IS SO ORDERED.

8 □ ||Dated: _ February 14, 2023 ssn (aioe JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Stip. and Prop. Order for Fees E.D. Cal. 2:20-cv-00662-JDP

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.