1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00117-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 12 v. DEFENDANT SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS ONLY 13 SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, et al., (ECF No. 25) 14 Defendants. 15 16 On February 15, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing all claims against 17 | Defendant Save Mart Supermarkets with prejudice. (ECF No. 25). In light of the parties’ 1g | Stipulation, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Qi), the case against only Defendant Save Mart 19 Supermarkets has been dismissed with prejudice. See Wilson v. City of San Jose,

, 0 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Save Mart Supermarkets as a pending defendant on the docket. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 | Dated: _ February 16, 2023 [spe ey — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28