(PC) McCoy v. Sacramento County Jail
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1] JEROME ELI MCCOY, No. 2:22-cv-1770 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al.
15 Defendants.
17 On January 19, 2023, plaintiff filed a request for a court-appointed investigator. ECF No. | 14. The expenditure of public funds on behalf of an indigent litigant is proper only when || authorized by Congress. Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210 (9th Cir. 1989). The in forma pauperis || statute does not authorize the expenditure of public funds for investigators. See 28 U.S.C. § 21 1915.
22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs request for an investigator (ECF || No. 14) 1s DENIED.
24 | DATED: March 22, 2023 ~ Cttt0 Lhar—e_ 25 ALLISONCLAIRE.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.