Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company v. Steinhauer
Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company v. Steinhauer
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] ACCELERANT SPECIALTY Case No. 1:22-cv-01583-JLT-EPG INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, 13 ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 4 V. DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
5 TIM STEINHAUER, (ECF No. 5) Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs notice of voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 5), 18 without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)G), as Defendant has 19 not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. In light of the voluntary dismissal, this 20 action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G), and has been dismissed without 21 | srejudice. See Wilson v. City of San Jose,
111 F.3d 688, 692(9th Cir. 1997). 22 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 | Dated: _ March 23, 2023 [spe ey □□ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown