Davidson v. District Attorney of Bakersfield
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TREVON FOREMAN and LOTISHA Case No. 1:22-cv-00581-ADA-CDB DAVIDSON, 12 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND Plaintiffs, RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 13 PLAINTIFF TREVON FOREMAN v. 14 (Doc. 13) DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BAKERSFIELD, 16 Defendant.
19 On November 2, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to dismiss Plaintiff Trevon Foreman (“Foreman”) for failing to comply with the Court’s orders and to prosecute this action. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110; Fed R. Civ. P. 11. The Court served the findings and recommendations on Foreman and gave him 21-days to file objections thereto. Foreman’s deadline for filing objections, if any, was November 23, 2022. As of the date of this Order, no objections have ben filed. The findings and recommendations advised Foreman that “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Doc. 13); Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998).
According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes the findings and | recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
2 Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS: 3 1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 2, 2022 (Doc. 13) are 4 adopted in full.
5 2. Plaintiff Trevon Foreman is DISMISSED from this case with prejudice.
6 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to remove Trevon Foreman from the docket.
10 IT IS SO ORDERED. ll Dated: _ April 6, 2023 UNITED fTATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.