United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2023

(PC) Ramirez v. KGET Channel 17 News

(PC) Ramirez v. KGET Channel 17 News
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided May 15, 2023
(PC) Ramirez v. KGET Channel 17 News

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NIKO J. RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00737-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING UNSIGNED COMPLAINT 13 v. (Doc. No. 1) KGET CHANNEL 17 NEWS, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Niko Ramirez, a prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint on May 12, 2023. (Doc. No. 1, Complaint). Upon review, the Court notes the Complaint is unsigned. (Doc. 1 at 8). Because the Court cannot consider unsigned filings, the Complaint must be stricken. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); L.R. 131(b). L.R. 131(b). See, e.g., West v. Hulbert, 2016 WL 2854416, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 16, 2016); Anderson v. Krpan, 2015 WL 22 402086, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2015).

23 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 24 1. The Clerk shall STRIKE Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 1) from the docket.

25 2. Within thirty (30) days of the date on this Order, Plaintiff shall file a complaint that is 26 signed under penalty of perjury.

27 3. The Clerk of Court shall include a prisoner civil rights complaint form for Plaintiff’s 28 use in filing his complaint.

1 4. Plaintiffs failure to timely comply with this Order will result in the undersigned 2 recommending the district court dismiss this case for Plaintiffs failure to comply with 3 a Court order and prosecute this action. > | Dated: _ May 14,2023 Mile. □□□ foareA Zacks 6 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.