(HC) Weisner v. Allison

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRANKIE WEISNER, No. 2:23-cv-0216 TLN CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KATHLEEN ALLISON, 15 Respondent.

17 On May 8, 2023, petitioner filed a motion for entry of default judgment. That motion was denied on June 21, 2023. The court explained to petitioner that respondent was not in default because on March 1, 2023, the court ordered that respondent file a response to petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus within 60 days, and respondent filed an answer on April 28, 2023. The court found petitioner’s motion for entry of default judgment frivolous, and petitioner was warned that if he continued to file frivolous motions, sanctions - which might include dismissal of this action - would issue.

24 Despite the court’s warning, petitioner filed a second motion for entry of default. Again, the motion is frivolous. The record reveals that respondent served a second copy of the answer on petitioner on May 9, 2023, after the court and respondent were notified on May 1, 2023, that petitioner’s address had changed. This was done as a courtesy to petitioner and is not a basis for ///// | holding respondent in default as petitioner argues. Service of the answer on petitioner’s address | of record on April 28, 2023, was fully effective.

3 The court will not sanction petitioner as this point, but the court warms petitioner again | that if he continues to file frivolous motions sanctions may issue, and such sanctions might || include dismissal of this action.

6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that petitioner’s motion for default || judgment (ECF No. 30) be denied.

8 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. Any response to the || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The | parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

16 | Dated: August 3, 2023 / ae □□ / a Ly a "7 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 18 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE weis0216.def(2)