Jones v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICK ALLEN JONES, et al. Case No. 1:23-cv-00410-CDB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED 13 v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS HEARTLAND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, LLC, et al.

15 TWO-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

ORDER RESETTING SCHEDULING 17 CONFERENCE 20 On March 20, 2023, Plaintiffs Rick Allen Jones and Andrea Jones (“Plaintiffs”) initiated this action against Defendants Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC, Camping World RV Sales, LLC, Huntington National Bank, and Stier’s RV Center, LLC (“Defendants”). (Doc. 1). That same day, the Court issued civil new case documents and set the initial scheduling conference for June 22, 2023. (Doc. 3). On June 1, 2023, because Plaintiff had not filed proofs of service consistent with the Court’s orders, the Court continued the scheduling conference to August 10, 2023. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff has yet to file proofs of service.

27 On August 10, 2023, the Court convened for the scheduling conference. (Doc. 19).

Defendants appeared through attorney William Louis Baker. Plaintiffs did not make an | appearance. Jd. Following repeated, unsuccessful attempts by the Court and counsel for | Defendants to contact counsel for Plaintiffs, the Court concluded the scheduling conference.

3 | Counsel for Plaintiffs did not in advance of the scheduling conference contact the Court to seek a | continuance and has not contacted the Court following the conference to explain his absence.

5 Local Rule 110 provides that “[fJailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules | or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all | sanctions... within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to | control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, | including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. | 2000).

11 Plaintiffs’ counsel failed to comply with the Court’s order to appear for the August 10, | 2023, scheduling conference, and through this misfeasance, is preventing the Court from | effectively managing its docket. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, no later than Monday, | August 14, 2023, counsel for Plaintiff SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions, up to and || including dismissal of this action, should not issue for his failure to appear for the scheduling || conference.

17 The scheduling conference is RESET for September 27, 2023, at 9:00am. The parties are || directed to meet and confirm in advance of that date to determine whether an updated Joint | Report with modified scheduled is necessary, in which case, an updated Joint Report shall be filed | at least one week in advance of the scheduling conference.

21 | IT IS SO ORDERED. ** | Dated: _ August 10, 2023 | Wr Pr 23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE