1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00205-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 12 | GUITI JIANG, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 18) 14 15 On August 28, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 18.) In light of 16 | the stipulation of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson 17 | v. City of San Jose,

(9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice, with 18 | each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 20 | the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 21 IS SO ORDERED. 2 FA. 3 Pated: _August 29, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28