(PC) Grant v. Covello

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BOBBY RAY GRANT JR., No. 2:21-cv-01878-WBS-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER PATRICK COVELLO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On September 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”).

28 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by | the record and by the proper analysis.

2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 28, 2023, are adopted in full; and 4 2. All claims and defendants other than plaintiffs claim for damages against defendant | Hernandez for failure to adequately treat his knee injury and a spider bite are dismissed for failure | to state a viable claim.

7 | Dated: November 3, 2023 oh hea . (et.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE