(PC) Vazquez-Gonzalez v. Arviza
Trial Court Opinion
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 IVAN VAZQUEZ-GONZALEZ, No. 1:23-cv-00925-SAB (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 9 SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (ECF No. 10) 10 M. ARVIZA, et al., 11 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant | to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotic Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
15 On September 26, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiffs complaint, found no cognizable | claim, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff has | not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. Accordingly, it is | HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of | service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to | comply with a court order, and failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiffs failure to | comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action for the reasons stated | above.
73 IT IS SO ORDERED. F- 2 ee | Dated: November 6, 2023 " UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.