(PC) Budd v. Harrison

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANTE RENEE BUDD, No. 2:23-cv-2313 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER J. HARRISSON, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney to voluntarily represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 22 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).

23 When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in declining to appoint counsel). The burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances is on the plaintiff. Id. Circumstances //// | common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not || establish exceptional circumstances that warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel.

3 Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff failed to meet his | burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of counsel at this || time.

6 Finally, on November 22, 2023, plaintiff filed another motion to proceed in forma || pauperis. (ECF No. 11.) However, plaintiff was previously granted leave to proceed in forma || pauperis. (ECF No. 8.) Therefore, plaintiff's November 22, 2023 motion is denied as moot.

9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 10 1. Plaintiffs motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 12) is denied without || prejudice; and 12 2. Plaintiff's November 22, 2023 motion (ECF No. 11) is denied as moot.

13 || Dated: November 30, 2023 i Aectl Aharon 15 KENDALL J. NE fbudd2313.31 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE