United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2023

(PC) McCraven v. Solano County Justice Center

(PC) McCraven v. Solano County Justice Center
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided December 1, 2023
(PC) McCraven v. Solano County Justice Center

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JESSICA MARIE McCRAVEN, Case No. 2:23-cv-01122-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A 13 v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER SOLANO COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, et al.¸ FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 THAT THIS MATTER BE DISMISSED FOR Defendants. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY 16 WITH COURT ORDERS 17 ECF No. 7 18 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS On August 25, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified her that her complaint did not state cognizable claims. ECF No. 5. I granted her thirty days to file an amended complaint or an advisement indicating her intent to stand by her current complaint, subject to a recommendation that it be dismissed. Plaintiff did not respond. Accordingly, on October 26, 2023, I ordered her to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 7. I warned her that failure to comply with that order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2.

The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise | responded.

2 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a | District Judge to this matter.

4 Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that: 5 1. This action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to | comply with court orders for the reasons set forth in the October 26, 2023, order.

7 2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close the case.

8 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days of | service of these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the | court and serve a copy on all parties. Such document should be captioned “Objections to | Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response shall be served and filed | within fourteen days of service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file | objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.

15 | Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 16 1991).

18 IT IS SO ORDERED.

19 ( q Sty — Dated: _ November 30, 2023 Q_-——— 20 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.