(PC) Salido v. Bureau of Prisons

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IGNACIO SALIDO, JR., No. 1:23-cv-01395-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 13 v. (ECF No. 10) BUREAU OF PRISONS, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

19 On November 8, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found no cognizable claim, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall be ordered to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order, failure to prosecute, and failure to state a cognizable claim. (Id.) 25 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order Plaintiff shall show 27 cause why the action should not be dismissed; and /// 1 2. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss this 2 action for the reasons stated above.

4 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee | Dated: _ December 19, 2023 ‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE