G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Dailey

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Dailey

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-03625-JSW 7 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 8 Re: Dkt. No. 51 9 JAMES ALLEN DAILEY and HALFTIME SPORTS BAR, LLC, 10 Defendants. 11

On November 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. Defendants

© = 13 proceed pro se.'! On December 5, 2022, the Court issued Defendants notice pursuant to Rand y.

Rowland,

154 F.3d 952, 963-64

(9th Cir. 1998), indicating that failure to oppose a motion for

IS summary judgment may result in the dismissal of this case with prejudice. A motion for summary

a 16 judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end the case. See

Rand,

154 F.3d at 963-64

. O a 18 Defendants were ordered to file an opposition to the motion and appearance of counsel for 19 the corporate defendant by no later than January 6, 2023. Defendants have filed nothing in 20 response. Accordingly, the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against 71 Defendants. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. □ 23 |! Dated: J anuary 10, 2023 ( | ff tt 24 \ LOS 25 / JEFFFIEN $. WHITE /Unit/A States PAstrict Judge 26 Lyf 27 ye 28 ' Defendant Halftime Sports Bar, LLC may not appear pro se. See Rowland v. California Men’s Colony,

506 U.S. 194, 202

(1993); N.D. Civ. L.R. 3-9(b).

Reference

Status
Unknown