1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PAUL DAVID JOHNSON, Case No. 22-cv-07858-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 Vv. RECONSIDERATION 10 SANCHEZ, et al., Wl Defendants. ECF No. 6

12 Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. He has not obtained, nor requested, 5 13 || leave to file such a motion, as required by Local Rule 7-9. Secondly, Plaintiffs challenges to the 14 || order of dismissal satisfy none of the grounds for reconsideration enumerated in Rule 60(b). His 3 15 || disagreement with the Court’s analysis and conclusion can be raised on appeal but does not a 16 || present a basis for reconsideration under Rule 60. See Twentieth Century - Fox Film Corp. v. 3 17 || Dunnahoo,

(9th Cir. 1981). 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: January 17, 2023 20 /) / 21 \ Halu) 4 Whe /ABFEREY S. WHITE / /Unifed ‘Statey/District Judge 23 “ 24 25 26 27 28