Camacho v. Uppal

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Camacho v. Uppal

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VIRIDIANA CAMACHO and JIMENA DEL | Case No.21-cv-09026-NC 8 ANGEL, a minor by and through his GAL ADAN DEL ANGEL NERIS, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL ? DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, 10 Re: Dkt. No.

34 V. 11

BUTA UPPAL, CANADA ROAD = 12 CARRIER, LTD., 13 Defendants. a

45 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

A 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this

17 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the

1g || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 19 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are 990 || VACATED. 21 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 99 || Life Ins. Co. of Am.,

511 U.S. 375, 381

(1994). 73 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 95 || Dated: January 30, 2023 he_——~ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS %6 United States Magistrate Judge 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown