I Richard L. Gillespie, Bar No. 275519 [email protected] 2 || Nicholas Gioiello, Bar No. 318418 [email protected] 3 | LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. ‘Treat Towers 4 || 1255 Treat Boulevard Suite 660 5 | Walnut Creek, California 94597 Telephone: 925.932.2468 6 | Fax No:: 925.946.9809 7 | Attorneys for Defendant SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC. 8 9 |} DANIEL L. FEDER, Bar No.130867 daniel(@dfederlaw.com 10} LAW @FFICES OF DANIEL FEDER 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1019 11 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 391-9476 12 | Fax No.: (415) 391-9432 13 || Attorneys for Plaintiff SONIA HERNANDEZ 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 | S@NIA HERNANDEZ, an individual, Case No. 4:22-cv-01201-HSG 19 Plaintiff, 20 V. JOINT STIPULATION TO BISMISS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE AND 21 | SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, PROPOSED ORDER INC., and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, 22 PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) Defendant. 23 Complaint Filed: January 20, 2022 24 25

27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 4:22-CV-01201-HSG PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)())(AMG

I TiS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Sonia Hernandez (“Plaintiff”), acting 2 | through her aitorney of record Danicl Feder, and Defendant SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES 3 USA, INC. (‘Defendant’), acting by and through its attorney of record Richard Gillespie, that the 4 | Complaint, and afl claims for relief therein, shall be dismissed in tts entirety, with prejudice of this 5 || action, pursuant to FRCP 41(ajc aD). 6 ITIS FURTHER STIPULATED and agreed that, each party to this litigation shal] bear his/its 7 | own costs and aitorney’s fees incurred. 8 Dated: March 7, 2023 LIPTLER MENDELSON, P.C. i Richard Gillespie 2 Nicholas Groiello 3 Atiomeys for Defendant _ SECURITAS SECURIFY SERVICES USA, INC. 14 13 | Dated: March 3, 2023 16 THE LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL FEDER 17 J ale □ BE ] g □□ ferragne LI hn Kail Daniel Feder Attorney for Plaintiff 20 | SONIA HERNANDEZ 24 | 22 | 23 24 25 | 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE I CASE NO. 4:22-CV-01201-HSG PPI OL LA RI THR UD A tre OR OSEESN

i ORDER 2 On March 23, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. In 3 | light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1 □□□□□ 4 | Wilson v. City of San Jose,

(9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. 5 || Accordingly, the Clerk of Court 1s directed to close this case. 6 7 | SO ORDERED. 8 | Dated: 3/9/2023 Alaura 3 Mb |. 10 DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 | 4855-3082-5557.1 /056919-1120 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 2 CASE NO. 4:22-CV-Q1201-HSG PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a)(1)(A)Gi)