1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TREVOR BARNES, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04299-TLT 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR 9 Vv. FAILURE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 SUNPOWER CORPORATION, ll Defendant. qg 12

13 On March 16, 2023, the Court entered an Order dismissing plaintiff's complaint with leave

14 || toamend. See ECF No. 36. Plaintiff's amended complaint was due by March 30, 2023. Id.

15 As of the date of this Order, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Thus, the Order 16 of dismissal stands, and the case is dismissed. See Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier,

, 989

= 17 || (9th Cir. 1999) (affirming dismissal of action following plaintiff's failure to amend complaint after Z 18 || receiving leave to do so, where the interest in expeditious resolution of litigation, the court’s 19 || management of its docket, and avoiding prejudice to defendants favored dismissal). 20 The Clerk of the Court shall close the file and not accept any further filings in this case. 21 This Order terminates the case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 || Dated: April 6, 2023 24 : ek TRINA ON 26 United States District Judge 27 28