Cyph, Inc. v. Zoom Communication, Inc.
Cyph, Inc. v. Zoom Communication, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CYPH, INC., Case No. 22-cv-00561-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER CONDITIONALLY 9 V. GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AND REQUIRING 10 ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, STATUS REPORT INC. Re: Dkt. No. 105 Defendant.
E 13 The Court has received the motion to withdraw as Plaintiff's counsel filed by Leena 14 || Mauskar, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for May 19, 2023. When withdrawal by an 3 15 || attorney from an action is not accompanied by simultaneous appearance of substitute counsel, 16 || leave to withdraw may be subject to the condition that papers continue to be served on counsel i 17 || unless and until the client appears by other counsel. See Civ. L.R. 11-5(b). As a corporation, Z 18 || Cyph, Inc. cannot represent itself. See Rowland v. California Men’s Colony,
506 U.S. 194, 201-02 19 || (1993); N.D. Civ. L.R. 3-9(b). Therefore, the Court grants the motion on the condition that papers 20 || from this case will continue to be served on Ms. Mauskar and Brundige & Stanger, P.C. for a 21 || period of thirty-days from the date of this Order, or until new counsel files a notice of appearance, 22 || whichever is sooner. Brundige & Stanger, P.C. shall file a status report regarding engagement of 23 || new counsel for Cyph, Inc. by May 15, 2023. 24 IT ISSO ORDERED. 25 || Dated: April 21, 2023 / / / Nits 7 JEPEREY/S /WHIT United yy jtes Distryft Judge 28 )
Reference
- Status
- Unknown