Refuerzo v. Southwest Airlines Co.

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RORESTE REFUERZO, Case No. 22-cv-00868-JSC 8 Plaintiff, 9 y. ORDER RE: PRIVILEGE DISPUTE Re: Dkt. No. 72 10 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CoO., ll Defendant.

13 The Court has reviewed in camera 23 email communications Defendant contends are || protected by attorney-client privilege and as work product. (Dkt. No. 72; see Dkt. No. 69 at 5-6, || 7-8.) The Court concludes the communications are privileged. See Fed. R. Evid. 501; United a 16 || States v. Chen, 99 F.3d 1495, 1501-02 (9th Cir. 1996).

18 IT IS SO ORDERED.

19 || Dated: April 21, 2023 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORL 22 United States District Judge