Frost v. Obama
Frost v. Obama
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 VINTON FROST, 5 CASE No. 4:20-cv-00605-YGR Plaintiff, 6 VS. 7 ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY BARACK OBAMA, INJUNCTION 8 Defendant. 9 10 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction.’ (Dkt. No. 25.) As 11 explained in this Court’s June 30, 2023 order denying leave to amend, plaintiff has not pled a valid || claim and has shown no likelihood of being able to do so. This case is closed. Further, this Court
& 13 || cannot grant a preliminary injunction where plaintiff has not pled a valid claim. Alliance for the Wild
Y 14 || Rockies v. Cottrell,
632 F.3d 1127, 1131-33(9th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.
15 The clerk shall not accept any further filings in this action. a 16 This order terminates docket number 25.
17 IT Is SO ORDERED.
Z 18 19 || Dated: July 14, 2023 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 jf — SSS 26 ' The Court has reviewed the instant motion and has determined it appropriate for decision without oral argument, as permitted by Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and Federal Rule of Civil 97 || Procedure 78. See Lake at Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Dev. Corp.,
933 F.2d 724, 729 (9th Cir. 1991). 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown