In re HIV Antitrust Litigation

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 IN RE HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC ORDER DENYING IHPPS’ MOTION 9 FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION 10 Docket No. 2066 14 In light of the jury verdict, the Court DENIES the IHPPs’ motion for a permanent 15 || injunction against Teva. See Mot. at 1 n.1 (“recogniz[ing] that in light of the Jury’s verdict, the || Court will likely deny this Motion under Ninth Circuit precedent”); see also Teutscher v. i 17 || Woodson, 835 F.3d 936, 944 (9th Cir. 2016) (“Because the Seventh Amendment's second clause Z 18 ‘prohibit[s] . . . the courts of the United States to re-examine any facts tried by a jury’ except as || permitted under the narrow ‘modes known to the common law,’ the court then must abide by the || jury’s findings of fact nm making any subsequent rulings.”). The Court does not rule on Teva’s || claim that the IHPPs waived the right to equitable relief.

22 This order disposes of Docket No. 2066.

23 IT ISSO ORDERED.

25 || Dated: July 14, 2023 26 LL 27 eh EDWAR . CHEN 28 United States District Judge