Turner v. Valor Merchant Services Company
Turner v. Valor Merchant Services Company
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 8 TERRANCE TURNER, 9 Plaintiff, No. C 23-03381 WHA 10 Vv. II || VALOR MERCHANT SERVICES ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND COMPANY, RECOMMENDATION Defendant.
14 The undersigned has reviewed the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge 3 15 Joseph C. Spero and agrees that this action should be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee 16 (Dkt. No. 8). In other words, plaintiff has failed to prosecute his case. No objection was 3 17 received in response to the report. The report contains one inaccuracy in stating that plaintiff 18 has not consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge when he has (Dkt. No. 5). 19 Nevertheless, because defendant has not done so, reassignment of this action was proper. See 20 Williams v. King,
875 F.3d 500, 503-04(9th Cir. 2017). This order ADOPTS IN FULL the 21 report and recommendations of Judge Spero with the foregoing correction. For the reasons 22 stated therein, this action is DISMISSED. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: October 18, 2023. 26 27 ( vA ~ / \ □□ 28 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown